How about telling NAG about the license violation here?
They do have lawyers etc.

Dima

On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:34 PM Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 7/4/24 03:23, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > To comply with the our license, they should have text of the
> > license _somewhere_.  Recursive grep for 'Numerical ALgorithms Group'
> > should find it (unless it is really obfuscated in some way).
>
> Yes, that is also how I read the license terms. The contents of our
> LISCENSE.txt must be included in the binary of Mathcad and it must be
> mentioned in the documentation that comes with the distribution.
>
> And yes, I also see their webpage as "documentation that comes with the
> distribution".
>
> Google for "fricas site:mathcad.com". I get an empty search result.
>
> In fact, here I can read:
>
> https://www.mathcad.com/en/blogs/whats-in-prime-7#Symbolics%20Enhancements
>
> """
> Symbolics Enhancements
>
> Mathcad Prime 6 introduced a new symbolic engine to the software,
> offering PTC’s software engineers more flexibility as they work with the
> software. For you, that means you’ll see modifications and enhancements
> that simply weren’t possible in the past.
> """
>
> Well, our license doesn't say that the name "FriCAS" should be
> mentioned. However, I do not think that their website shows good behaviour.
>
> > I guess that given name interested folks can use Google to find
> > FriCAS license.  But I do not think that internet counts as
> > 'materials provided with the distribution'.
>
> Yes exactly. And "given name" is a prerequisite for typing something
> into google. Unfortunately, I do not find that name (FriCAS) somewhere
> mentioned.
>
> >> Sage doesn't develop new domains, MathCAD does.  So they are more likely
> >> to hit by bugs.
> >
> > Not clear to me.  Usig Spad code means that they may be affected
> > by bugs in the Spad compiler.  OTOH for simple constructs Spad
> > compiler was quite reliable.  And using Spad they are less
> > affected by interpreter bugs.
>
> Waldek, it sounds as if you do not care much about this issue. Why would
> it be so hard for them to mention "FriCAS"? Honestly, I do not know why
> they are behaving like this in th first place.
>
> > One, likely possibility is that they developed what they need
> > around 2018 and keep using essentially the same thing.
>
> Still, they have to comply to the license.
>
> Ralf
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/9e029a33-ac5e-4344-b3f4-100a69d675d8%40hemmecke.org.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAAWYfq2QhKGX-YUFvehTtvqLd6%3DC1xGX2r1cYN8EvJFHV--q4g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to