Frankly speaking , to be consistent, the only thing to take in it is
'*.output'.

It's my mistake, shame on me, I quickly sent the diff  because I was
working on a new Git management environment and that with other successful
things made me overly enthusiastic.

I should have only evoked *.output.

Le dim. 24 sept. 2023, 21:34, Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 07:14:53PM +0200, Grégory Vanuxem wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm setting up a new more general Git management environment on my
> > machine and looking at the FriCAS vanilla .gitignore file, I allowed
> > myself to send here a diff with the one I use. I just did two
> > additions today to the one I use. It could be of interest even if some
> > stuff will not suit all needs.
>
> To say the truth, I would prefer to keep .gitignore as small as
> possible.  IIUC .gitignore plays role when commiting changes.
> At that time git remainds about possibly forgotten files.
> When using separate build directory there should be almost
> no trash in repository, so not much need to ignore things.
> OTOH too wide ignore pattern may lead to missing files during
> commit.
>
> --
>                               Waldek Hebisch
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/ZRCPP1GCzffnBnBF%40fricas.org
.

__
Greg

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAHnU2dagwNRwdN9q0%2BpNybRKEHd65jxqpSsN7zOPFdGZA1egmw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to