Shouldn't that be true? Is this an oversight in the implementation?
(159) -> SparseUnivariatePolynomial(Integer) has Canonical
(159) false
Same for UnivariatePolynomial('x, Integer).
Should I open an issue for this? Basically we currently ignore "Canonical".
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/d6bcfdaa-3d9b-4289-c46d-b01bae739abb%40hemmecke.org.
