Hi, I am not so sure what semantics we should give to l(3..7 by -2).
The empty list looks quite natural to me, since expand(3..7 by -2) is also empty. Maybe some people would like to see l(3..7 by -2) = [3,5,7] as a result. What is your opinion? Ralf (62) -> l := expand(1..9) (62) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] (63) -> l(3..7 by 2) (63) [3, 5, 7] (64) -> l(3..7 by -2) (64) [] (65) -> l(7..3 by -2) (65) [7, 5, 3] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/21864e40-8578-4d8f-acc2-063cdcc6a03f%40hemmecke.org.
