On 17.05.22 04:41, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
I consider removal of rdesys.spad and
OK.
cyclotom.spad after release.
Nearly OK.
Instead of cyclotom.spad we have now cyclo.spad which has better
performance (due to better algorithm) and more functionality.
I already use the function cyclotomic(n)$CyclotomicPolynomialPackage in
my QEta package. It would cause unnecessary trouble / compatibility
problems if I then must have two package versions around, one for people
on FriCAS 1.3.7 and one for people that compile from the sources after
removal of that package.
Wouldn't it be an option to provide the functions in cyclo.spad under
the package name CyclotomicPolynomialPackage when you remove
cyclotom.spad so that there would be no effect on end-users?
I do not care about the other two functions
cyclotomicDecomposition : Integer -> LSUP
++ cyclotomicDecomposition(n) returns prime factors of
++ \spad{x^n - 1} over integers.
cyclotomicFactorization : Integer -> FR
++ cyclotomicFactorization(n) returns prime factors of
++ \spad{x^n - 1} over integers.
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/6cb3da0a-bfd1-8490-ae13-43cc073530cb%40hemmecke.org.
