> There were plans in early period of open source Axiom.  AFAIK there
> are no visible results.  There would be some benefit if one could
> compile algebra using Aldor.  Relatively recently I did a little
> experiment and it seems that there is a lot of use of few constructs
> that are valid and perfectly good Spad but which are rejected by
> Aldor.  IMO if one seriously thinks about using Aldor to compile
> FriCAS algebra one first needs to modify Aldor to accept those
> constructs.

Waldek, can you give a list of those constructs so that we can show them
publicly in "Differences between Aldor and SPAD"?

> Also, on files that I tried Aldor compiler was about 10 times slower
> than Spad compiler.  For me Spad compiler is slow and 10 times
> slowdown would be step back.

That is one issue. But honestly, it is more important to me if the
compiled code runs faster and is safer.

Ralf

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/de6b5c0e-feb8-1628-6f83-513b4ddeb069%40hemmecke.org.

Reply via email to