I was not asking whether you removed all bugs from FriCAS, but rather whether you intended to fix the "%iint in output" issue with this commit and believe that you succeeded or whether you are *sure* that you left some cases.
It is about conveying some information with the commit message. "Better" tells almost nothing. Anyway, I am happy that you fixed at least this one issue. Thanks. Ralf On 28.01.21 01:35, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:09:04PM -0800, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >> Waldek, >> your commit >> >> commit 240e2641928fab6f3bd2d638c5d5c437a8f68d7a >> Author: Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu Jan 21 21:09:35 2021 +0100 >> >> Better handle '%iint' >> >> cures the initial issue, but does it also prevent %iint from ever appearing >> in user output? > > Well, I fixed one bug. It is unrealistic to expect that single > fix will fix all possible bugs involving %iint. As I wrote, > when there is a bug we want to see it (to be able to fix it). > > To say this differently: when you have data structure like > a stack than pushes and pops should be balanced. Fixing > one issue with lack of balance does not mean the problem > will not appear in different place. Better code structure > (possible after rewrite) can signifcantly reduce risk, > but ATM eliminating all bugs is unrealistic. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/56d1a261-6bdf-0e62-accb-dfb289881e9e%40hemmecke.org.
