> We have LaurentPolynomial. The whole point of our series is that they > are lazy.
Lazyness is not totally important, but might be, because my series might grow rather fast and with complicated coefficient formulas. Actually, I thought I could stay in UnivariateLaurentSeries for two reasons. (1) There is no simple conversion from series to polynomial without much much conversion and (2) when I failed with easily just calling an existing function for (1) I realized that truncated series could do the job and would avoid the computation of coefficients that are not important for the result. In fact the truncation will happen in a place with a bound that maybe much to high. So yes, I would prefer lazyness. I will try to program a new domain that inherits from UnivariateLaurentSeries, but overrides the zero? function. No idea whether this TruncatedUnivariateLaurentSeries could be interesting for inclusion in FriCAS. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/4e913419-b0f4-c26b-96f6-447e6cab6bf5%40hemmecke.org.
