On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 12:01:45AM +0100, Kurt Pagani wrote: > Quite interesting! But some will take rather long (~1h) e.g. the second in > rint0 > (almost quicker solved by hand ;).
It is very easy example, ATM I do not know why it takes so much time. > Nevertheless very useful to find a leak. > > Recently I tried to convert LISP examples, especially "tilu.lisp" from > > RJF's website: https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/examples.in > > Surpisingly, it works: tilu.input -> tilu_ints.input -> tilu_ints.out. > it takes only a fes seconds to eval the >2000 integrals (amazing). > Some tricks are necessary, because the arity of LISP (*) and (+) is not > restricted to 2. The reason why I mention this here, there seems to be random > integral generators for CL and I found a strange behavior when entering "add" > or > trying to convert the symbol "+" to InputForm: > > > (1) -> add > Line 1: add > A > Error A: syntax error at top level > Error A: Improper syntax. > 2 error(s) parsing 'add' is a keyword, no wonder that parser complains. Use '_add' if you need to disable its syntactic significance. > (2) -> pp:INFORM:='+::INFORM > Line 1: pp:INFORM:='+::INFORM > .............A > Error A: Improper syntax. > 1 error(s) parsing addition is also special. -- Waldek Hebisch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/20200111134703.GB5465%40math.uni.wroc.pl.
