What about asking the maintainer of GCL? BTW, why do you consider it so important to support so many Lisp dialects? If it works without much effort, then fine. But investing much time in supporting too many dialects is a waste of time in my eyes. (Of course, you decide about your time.)
Ralf On 7/12/19 1:23 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > A little update about GCL: I was able to build fricas with > newer GCL. However, ATM the result is unusable. Namely > FriCAS used to overwrite GCL error handler with its own. > Something in GCL changed and this does no longer work. > I was able to build FriCAS disabling our error handler, > but as result any error goes into GCL debugger, so from > point of view of naive user FriCAS is unusable. And > our tests depend on error handling so I am unable to > test if there is any other breakage. > > Bottom line is that ATM building with GCL does not > work. I must admit that I consider declaring GCL > as unsupported: I would prefer not to dig into GCL > internals to find out what changed in error handling > and how to install our handler. If ANSI support in > GCL is good enough we could try to install error > handler in ANSI way (this is how we handle other > implementations). But I did not try this. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/6fb01713-a363-dfd7-9f5e-4d25796372a0%40hemmecke.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
