Hi Ralf! Anyway, I still think it's potentially more dangerous than its gain. >
Well, I must say that I believe that this is one of the reasons why sage now excels: to be useful, it is much better to solve a few instances of a problem, instead of giving up because one cannot solve the problem completely. Instead, it is much better to have something partially working, and warn the user of possible problems. Concerning the original question: it might in fact be the case that fricas would be the only system capable of computing Smith normal forms of matrices with entries being power series out of the box. I am not sure whether that's useful, though. (sage has power series, but they pale in comparison) Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/dda748cf-484d-4f1f-b62b-d8eae8741c62%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
