"Degenerate constructs like a 1 group symmetry feel, to me, like
metaphysical commitments..."

Glen,

In an attempt to understand Eric's response to me, I got to reading this
group-theory dense paper reasoning with kernels and strata about
spontaneous symmetry breaking[1]. It got me understanding your skepticism
toward the trivial group as an instance of the no-hiding theorem. Can
anyone ever really crumple up a napkin to the point that it becomes
different in kind? I am in San Diego staring at the ocean, watching it
tirelessly produce and destroy novelty all along the shore.

[1]
https://www.ihes.fr/~vergne/LouisMichel/publications/SponSymBr.1985_1.pdf
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to