While watching my two little dogs run around our house, it struck me that a
feature that distinguishes living from non-living entities is the apparent
effortlessness with which living ones navigate the world. Imagine how
difficult it would be to build a robot that could navigate the world so
effortlessly. To make the comparison a bit simpler, imagine how difficult
it would be to build a robotic cockroach.

When I asked ChatGPT whether anyone has built a robotic cockroach, it
came up with these examples. (I haven't checked to see whether these are
real projects.)


   -

   DASH: The Dynamic Autonomous Sprawled Hexapod (DASH) robot, developed at
   the University of California, Berkeley, was inspired by the rapid
   locomotion of cockroaches. It has six legs and can move quickly on various
   terrains using a simple control mechanism.


   -

   Harvard RoboBee: Although not specifically modeled after a cockroach,
   the Harvard RoboBee project aims to develop small, insect-like robots.
   These tiny flying robots are inspired by the mechanics and flight
   capabilities of insects and demonstrate similar agility and maneuverability.


   -

   iSprawl: The iSprawl robot, developed at the University of California,
   Berkeley, was inspired by cockroaches' ability to squeeze through small
   spaces. It uses a compliant body design and six legs to navigate tight and
   cluttered environments.


   -

   VelociRoACH: Developed at the University of California, Berkeley, the
   VelociRoACH is a fast-running robot designed to mimic the high-speed
   locomotion of cockroaches. It utilizes a legged design and has demonstrated
   impressive speed and agility.

These mainly explore locomotion. Besides locomotion, cockroaches notice
when someone enters an area where they are exposed. They quickly scuttle
off to some hiding place. How do they sense the presence of a new being?
How do they know where the hiding places are? How do they know how to move
in the right direction? How do they know how to avoid small obstacles and
fires? Etc.

One can argue that these capabilities are hard-wired in. But that
doesn't make it any easier. These are still capabilities they have, that
would be a challenge to build.

I became amazed at how well-connected living entities are to their
environments. They quickly and easily extract and use information from
their environment that is important to their survival.

Man-made robots have nowhere near that level of embeddedness and
environmental integration.

Was it Rodney Brooks who said that we should build that sort of
connectedness before worrying about building intelligence into our robots?
Today that struck me as an important insight.
-- Russ Abbott
Professor Emeritus, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to