On 2/16/23 11:26 AM, glen wrote:
I don't grok the context well enough to equivocate on concepts like "have" and "category of being". But in response to Nick's question: "What is there that animals do that demands us to invent categories to explain their behavior?", my answer is "animals discretize the ambient muck". So if categorization is somehow fundamentally related to discretization, then animals clearly categorize in that sense.

.. or more elaborately?  "life *transduces* gradients and spectra (light, sound, chemistry) and then *thresholds* the results into what we would nominally call "discrete categories".  The actual definition of those categories, the stimulus-response patterns are actually built upon (created under the shaping of) some kind of utility function (variations on survival in some sense).   One step removed from this is to begin to "name" these categories and modulate and relate (adjectives and verbs) them to one another and from that build elaborate models of cause/effect that can be used to leverage our sensory inputs in pursuit of optimizing said utility functions?   Semiotic theory probably already has a suite of terminology for this?

But Nick does follow that question with this "experience" nonsense. So my guess is there *is* some sophistry behind the question, similar to EricC's incredulous response to DaveW's question about phenomenological composition of experience(s). What I find missing in Nick's (and EricC's) distillation of experience monism is an account of the seemingly analogous position of panpsychism.
I don't know if I am fully untangling this construction:   I personally am drawn (intuitively) to panpsychism but more in abstract theory than in practice.   I rarely treat a brick or stone as if it has any level of sentience, yet I do grant (impute) *something* like sentience onto more complex units.  That would be especially life itself, and especially life at my personal scale such as a tree or a horse, while it might be easier to ignore whatever complex adaptivity a protozoa or an entire forest or coral reef or the biosphere as a whole might have (because it is out of my physical/time scale).   But many artifacts in my world which I have an intimate relationship with, I tend to impute *some* sentience (or at least agency/identity) onto?  House, Vehicles, Garden, some toolsets?


-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to