Someone here is more likely than I to have actually read Ziblatt and Levitsky's How Democracies Die <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Democracies_Die#:~:text=How%20Democracies%20Die%20is%20a,process%20to%20increase%20their%20power.>
A recent article (behind a subscribe-wall) included the following quote:

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2022-01-20/americas-coming-age-instability

   /
   /
   /America may no longer be safe for democracy, but it remains
   inhospitable to autocracy./
   /Rather than autocracy, the United States appears headed toward
   endemic regime instability.
   /
   /
   /
   /Such a scenario would be marked by frequent constitutional crises,
   including contested or stolen elections and severe conflict between
   presidents and Congress (such as impeachments and executive efforts
   to bypass Congress), the judiciary (such as efforts to purge or pack
   the courts), and state governments (such as intense battles over
   voting rights and the administration of elections). The United
   States would likely shift back and forth between periods of
   dysfunctional democracy and periods of competitive authoritarian
   rule during which incumbents abuse state power, tolerate or
   encourage violent extremism, and tilt the electoral playing field
   against their rivals./
   /
   /

I found this characterization of our plight very compelling, if also very disturbing.

It seems as if we have "tumbled our gyros" but in a different mode than the rhetoric about "Civil War" and "Descent into Autocracy" seem to suggest.   It also characterizes a lot of the aspiring/limping democracies we know of in the world today up to and including extreme examples such as Russia which fits the DINO (democracy in name only) label pretty well.

This conception of the problem lead me to a very well written HS student-essay by the same title: democracy-in-name-only <https://hac.bard.edu/amor-mundi/democracy-in-name-only-2020-01-02>.

Within this essay was a poignant quote:


   In the words of Alexis de Tocqueville,

       “A new science of politics is needed for a new world. This,
       however, is what we think of least; launched in the middle of a
       rapid stream, we obstinately fix our eyes on the ruins which may
       still be descried upon the shore we have left, while the current
       sweeps us along, and drives us backward toward the gulf.”


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to