I seriously doubt much transmission outside, anywhere, moist or dry ... unless you're all packed together spitting "No Masks Mandates!" or "Defund the Patriarchy!" into your friends' faces. It's *indoor* transmission that I worry about, in particular ill-ventilated spaces. I've never had the luxury of a whole-house humidifier. But I understand that many people use them. One of the reasons I left SFe was the constant nosebleeds from the dry air. And I expect swamp coolers humidify the air quite a bit, though I have no idea about that 50% number.
On 1/12/22 09:14, thompnicks...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so. I read the original thing. It would seem to predict, wouldn't it, that dry climate transmission would be much lower than wet. Put it round the other way: these data would be a plausible explanation for why the disease is less prevalent in dry climates. But it isn't. Am I reading it wrong?
-- glen Theorem 3. There exists a double master function. .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
