Could be. But isn’t it obvious that writing a CA in some imperative language requires less hand wringing? What is the payoff? So much of this stuff ends up coming across as “Look you can do the thing you already knew how to do!” What can I do that I couldn’t do before?
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Barry MacKichan Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 8:52 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] stygmergy, CA's, and [biological] development Aha! I think the exercise here was to come up with a categorical statement. —Barry On 25 Oct 2021, at 10:19, Marcus Daniels wrote: It is hard to find the motivation to invest much in category theory when the practical considerations are left as an exercise to the reader.
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
