Sounds interesting, but it's $19.

-- Russ Abbott
Professor, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles


On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:59 AM uǝlƃ ☤>$ <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them
> https://muse.jhu.edu/article/796000
>
> Katharina presented this idea awhile back and the paper's finally come
> out. She reinterprets the fallacy from the normal triad <arguer,
> strawmanner, audience> to a *temporal*, but dyadic <arguer@t1,
> strawmanner, arguer@t2>. That makes it much more practical, at least in
> the sense of, for example, reading your own code a year after you wrote it
> ... or even in the sense of parallelized behaviors - as a demonstration of
> why pair-programming works, where the arguer is of "two minds", one who
> constructs things and one who evaluates things. That latter even applies to
> a multi-tasking separation of thought vs. finger-memory and typos.
>
> --
> ☤>$ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to