That's a report written for the general reader?!?

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021, 1:09 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Phellow Phriamers,
>
>
>
> After an ox-stunning spate of hot weather, we are now back in the 59
> degree fog bank here in sunny Massachusetts.  I cannot go out in the
> garden, so you all are the “beneficiaries” of my being at loose ends.
>
>
>
> As one might expect, when Meteorology developed between the wars, it took
> on a military metaphor.  There were armies of warm and cold air that fought
> for control of the landscape.  Between them were “fronts” where warm air
> would liberate  the land only to be reconquered by the cold air.  The
> fronts were ideally thought of as sharp changes in temperature, dewpoint
> and wind direction accompanied by a fall and then a rise in pressure.  I
> used to draw weather maps as a kid from the station reports on SW radio,
> and I found it much harder to locate fronts than the metaphor allowed.  It
> seemed more like a contest between guerilla units than the advance and
> retreat of disciplined armies along a front.  In fact, when I wrote the
> weather book, I couldn’t find an archetypal weather map that demonstrated
> fronts cleanly, and so had to draw the fronts and then *make up the
> observations to illustrate the concept.*
>
>
>
> I read forecast discussions obsessively, partly for the science and partly
> because their language is so rich and tortured.  Talk about metaphors!  In
> any case, these discussions are becoming harder and harder to read purely
> in terms of military incursions at the surface and more and more a matter
> of upper=air fluid dynamics.   I thought perhaps that was because I have
> been living at 7000 for a year-and-a-half with more than the quarter of the
> atmosphere already below me.
>
>
>
> But now I am back in MA and the forecast discussions are still talking
> about upper air features as much as they are about surface ones. Below is a
> current discussion, marked up by me to translate some of the Jargon.  It is
> full of references to upper level events.
>
>
>
> Now here is my quandary.  Given Critchlow’s Law [LAYERS IN THE ATMOSPHERE
> DO NOT MIX [ but they can be STiRRED —NST]], how on earth do events in
> the upper atmosphere affect events in the lower atmosphere.   Think of
> those jet streams roaring along a 100 mph up at 30,000 feet.  They contain
> only 10 percent of the mass of the atmosphere.  How are we to thinking of
> them as affecting anything below them.   What metaphor is at work when we
> think of the ridges and troughs aloft as causing the highs, lows and
> front’s at the surface.
>
>
>
> Also, do jet’s use more fuel or less fuel when flying with a jet stream;
> on the one hand you would expect less because they are getting help from
> the wind; on the other you would expect less because the plane has to fly
> faster to stay aloft.  Or perhaps the same because the two factors
> compensate for one another?
>
>
>
> Anyway, here’s the forecast discussion, as annotated  .
>
>
>
>
>
> Tuesday Night through Friday:
>
>
>
> Rain from the daytime Tuesday period come to an end early Tues night. The 
> vast majority of the mid to latter part of the workweek features really 
> pleasant weather, under cyclonic flow 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=flow> aloft (associated with 
> an anomalously *[= unusually]*strong upper trough 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=trough> over eastern CONUS 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=CONUS>) and a surface ridge 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=ridge> of high pressure. Cool 
> pocket *[= a layer of air over head that its unsually cool for its 
> altitude]*of air aloft and below-normal 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=normal> 850 mb 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=mb> temps with strong 
> insolation <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=insolation> *[= 
> sunlight]*support deep mixing *[= when air is cool aloft and heated at the 
> surface it tends to convect, and therefore to be stirred to the next layer of 
> warmer air.]*; fairly small thing but opted to lower dewpoints toward the 
> 10th percentile NBM values each afternoon given the envisioned strong mixing. 
> Expect mostly sunny skies with clear nights and fairly strong diurnal 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=diurnal> ranges in temps.
>
>
>
> By Friday, mid-level trough 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=trough> *[= a trough is a dip 
> in the upper air flow, like the dip between two waves; the tops of the waves 
> are called ridges]*axis shifts offshore as geopotential heights *[= a 
> “height” is the altitude at which a particular pressure is reached. It is the 
> weight of the atmosphere below that point. Think low pressure, 
> roughly]*transition to shortwave 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=shortwave> ridging*[= i.e., a 
> teensy ridge]*. Warming trend to temperatures then set to commence as well 
> with 925 mb <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=mb> temps upper 
> teens to around 20C/850 mb 
> <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=mb>  *[= i.e. in the 3-5,000 
> foot range. This is very generally the top of the layer which interacts with 
> the surface, but of course, for mother church members, it’s two to four 
> thousand feet below the bottoms of their shoes. ]* temps around the mid teens 
> C <https://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=C>. Dewpoints *[= the 
> dewpoint is the temperature at which water vapor condenses. Low dewpoint air 
> is dry air, and, therefore, heavier than wetter air around it. Since the 
> body’s cooling mechanisms depend on evaporation, it is also “more comfortable 
> to be in warm dry air than to be in warm wet air.  Think swamp 
> coolers.]*still look comfortable (mid to upper 50s) but will see highs in the 
> interior push into the low-mid 80s.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nick Thompson
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to