That's an excellent question. I've only had the chance to glance at those 3 cites. To decide how they could help propagate signals would take more investment. It would be helpful if you could give a short blurb about why each one came to mind as appropriate for reciprocity. I remember you mentioned this or another Levine paper in the context of EricS' Beyond Fitness paper. So, I'm wondering if you mention that one by Levine simply because you're steeped in it?
Regardless, I'll try to do a closer skim of each over the next week or so. On 5/11/21 2:21 PM, jon zingale wrote: > I have failed to follow this discussion very closely. That said, to what > extent could frameworks like those that underlie spring rank > <https://github.com/cdebacco/SpringRank> or gauge-theoretic price as > curvature <https://arxiv.org/pdf/0908.3043.pdf> give reasonable > characterizations of reciprocity over circuits? To what extent does Levine's > <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/002251938090288X> > (painfully straightforward) solving for eigenstates? -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
