Dear EricS,
It occurred to me that you, of all people, might have something to say about the question of how natural selection came about. I assume it was "scaffolded" by some physical process or constraint in a manner analogous to the "scaffolding" of life by white smokers at the bottom of the sea. Most accounts of evolution I have encountered start with the assumption of sufficient modularity for selection to go forward. But given all the inevitable trait-entanglements in the developmental process, this assumption seems wildly gratuitous to me. Any thoughts you might share with me (us) would be great appreciated. I attach a decade-old outline of an essay I never wrote (because I wasn't really comptent to do so) to explain the problem Hope you are well and getting vaccinated soon. Nick Nick Thompson thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
<<attachment: Warring_Darwinians_for_Glen_Steve_(003).doc>>
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/