Dear EricS,

 

It occurred to me that you, of all people, might have something to say about
the question of how natural selection came about.  I assume it was
"scaffolded" by some physical process or constraint in a manner analogous to
the "scaffolding" of life by white smokers at the bottom of the sea.  Most
accounts of evolution I have encountered start with the assumption of
sufficient modularity for selection to go forward.  But given all the
inevitable trait-entanglements in the developmental process, this assumption
seems wildly gratuitous to me.  Any thoughts you might share with me (us)
would be great appreciated.   I attach a decade-old outline of an essay I
never wrote (because I wasn't really comptent to do so) to explain the
problem

 

Hope you are well and getting vaccinated soon. 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> 

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

<<attachment: Warring_Darwinians_for_Glen_Steve_(003).doc>>

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to