I wonder about the Joe Rogan podcast as a venue for substantive narratives. I suppose, given the wackos he implicitly advocates by giving them a prominent platform, the emphasis might be placed on *either* "substance" or "narrative" at one's leisure.
That's one of the reasons I dig things like the Lovecraft mythos or deep nonsense like Chaos Magick, weak on substance and long on narrative. But I suppose, like the targetless model, the narrative itself can be the object of study even if the only substance is the narrative itself ... a kind of impredicative Ouroboros. On 10/13/20 10:32 AM, jon zingale wrote: > I don't know about Joey Six, Christians, or what to do about anything. > Brian's rhetorical form is pleasant to listen to and the content is clearly > well researched. He offers a window into an interesting and controversial > subject in the history of the west. Like when listening to "curator's > corner", I long for structurally substantive narratives that are rooted in > empirical findings. Alas like 3-ways, it may be a fetish best kept behind > closed doors 8^D -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
