https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/philosophy/docs/glymour/glymour-kim1999.pdf
I hope that link works. I have posted it here before. Please read it if you're interested in this topic. Glymour is my erstwhile boss and co-author. --- Frank C. Wimberly 140 Calle Ojo Feliz, Santa Fe, NM 87505 505 670-9918 Santa Fe, NM On Mon, Oct 5, 2020, 11:04 AM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > Russ wrote: > > > > < A probabilistic version of LaPlacian causality may be more or less > correct, but the number of levels at which one has to apply it in any > complex situation makes it virtually impossible to use. An approximate > approach like Glen suggests may be the best we can do--at least for now. > > > > > Use for what? Understanding what it might mean to be alive or designing > a system for regulating the behavior of each other? Or predicting > behavior? Or what? The impulse that I object to is inventing an > unrealistic fantasy like free will just for the sake of reducing cognitive > dissonance. I can’t be necessary to adopt what amounts to a religion in > order to function with one another. > > > > Marcus > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam > un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ >
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
