I think that it is interesting that the lecturer introduces this position as an extension of structuralism. Where do you stand with the earlier assertion: "As analytic philosophers might prefer to put it, thought and language are capable of determining things only up to isomorphism". Do you also feel that this position is also totally bullshit?
-- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
