1. "wherefore" means "why", not "where". 2. I'm working, not monitoring the lists all day. 3. The simplest comparison I can come up with is that FRP is more of a continuous-signal model and Actors are a discrete-event model. Otherwise there are lots of similarities. Actors are reactive program entities with private storage, computation resources, and communication facilities for sending asynchronous messages to other actors. 4. I hope that is helpful ;-)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:39 AM uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ <[email protected]> wrote: > Dale? Dale! Wherefore art thou? > > > http://www.dalnefre.com/wp/2020/01/requirements-for-an-actor-programming-language/ > > On 8/10/20 8:56 AM, jon zingale wrote: > > This looks pretty interesting. Recently, Marcus posted on FRP models > which > > seem to be an alternative (to actor models) route to solving similar > > problems. Do you have any insight as to their comparative qualities? > > > -- > ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ > > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam > un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ > FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC> > http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ >
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
