On 6/14/20 6:34 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > > Sure, ok. I don’t know what any of this has to do with Russ’ lecture > on free will. > > I was just responding in the affirmative to the apparently underlying > question of if we are all reactive machines. Of course we are. While > the reaction could be complicated, or the stimulus could be > communicated over a faulty channel and thus result in a response that > is inappropriate, how **could** it be any other way? I didn’t say > anything about the taxonomy of machines being limited or any > individual instance being simplistic. That’s just a straw man. > ... and I was just... being "reactive"?
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
