I disagree completely. Right there in the description we see 2 layers of prestidigitation: "Numerically simulated" and "Visualized". Then when we click on the psc link, we get a 404 error. This is akin to a magician sawing a woman in half on stage. Unless you see the *numbers* (since it's "numerically simulated") and unless you see whatever is being "visualized", you should definitely not take it seriously.
On 5/13/20 2:35 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote: > You should take it seriously but I'm biased. I don't think PSC let's its > supercomputers be used for eye candy. They didn't when I worked there and > they were accountable to NSF. > > On Wed, May 13, 2020, 3:26 PM <thompnicks...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Phellow Phriammers, >> >> Is this eyecandy, or should I take it seriously? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gQutQQiuAI&feature=youtu.be -- ☣ uǝlƃ .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
