Glen writes:

< Can the sub-models coupled like in the paper be in different phases? Or is 
the coupling "tight" such that a transition in one sub-system forces a 
transition everywhere? >

One might have a situation like below where the bond strengths between 
molecules were gradually getting weaker, giving the effect of an increasing 
temperature.   If the logical operations (as described) were in place of H2O, 
then the "molecules" would be a bit more complex and retain at least the same 
relative magnitudes between the bonds, but some of the bonds between the 
logical operations could be relaxed.   At a high level, to your question, the 
metaphor that comes to mind is ice cubes in a cup of water.

[cid:b1d8025b-3083-480b-936e-a0668141f1b3]
________________________________
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣ 
<geprope...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:50 AM
To: FriAM <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] YIKES!: Coronavirus New Mexico numbers.xlsx

This re-raises Marcus' contribution to preserving the analogy between phase 
changes and socio-political upheaval:

On 3/23/20 9:48 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fict.2016.00014/full

I haven't had time to answer a question I have through my own homework. So I'll 
just risk embarrassment and ask it here. Can the sub-models coupled like in the 
paper be in different phases? Or is the coupling "tight" such that a transition 
in one sub-system forces a transition everywhere?

Carrying on abusing the bad analogy ... if the coupling is loose enough to 
allow mixed phases, then I'd argue the Medea hypothesis is flawed and composite 
systems do not work that way. It's not suicide at all, but more like a dynamic 
immune system, where one part attacks another part, perhaps because of 
ignorance that the other part is coupled to itself in some way.

  "Give me back my haaaaaand!"
  https://youtu.be/-5XAmupw8jo


On 4/2/20 10:29 AM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> I (re)submit the alternative to Gaia which is the Medea hypothesis:
>
>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medea_hypothesis
>
> perhaps no more (or less) absurd as an allegorical referent


--
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to