No, it's OK. I just don't understand. To be clear, I kinda like Dan Dennett's concept of "intrinsic emergence". I may not remember it well. But it goes something like this: emergence exists when the higher level language is more computationally expressive than the lower level language.
I only kinda like it because I would prefer something like: emergence exists when the post-map language has a different expressibility than the pre-map language. By removing "level", referring to the gen-phen map directly, and not requiring the containership of more or less expressibility, it seems more palatable to me. But I don't know if my re-phrasing even makes sense. On 5/7/19 1:39 PM, Nick Thompson wrote: > Sorry. I guess I am either trying to precise what you have said or urge you > to tell how it is that you have NOT said that. -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
