I was struggling to find something to disagree with. 8^) But of course, I found it.
A story is not (purely) imaginary nor a (mere) reformulation of past experience. I think it's part-and-parcel of consciousness, whatever that is. We tell ourselves stories all the time, big and small ones. Is there a difference between a dynamic story and a static story? [Non]Linear stories? Multiple story tellers versus an omniscient third party narrator? Interactive versus passive? [†] Yes, of course. But they're still stories. [†] Bandersnatch was interesting: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9495224/ On 1/28/19 10:47 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > A story is imaginary or a reformulation of past experience. It's written > down and static. A story has to fit together or else it is not a story, it > is improvisation. A LEO would have to model the situation and estimate what > risks she was prepared to take and to reconcile her job with her own values. > A third situation would be the person that wants to visit different > environments and develop the ability to navigate them, without regard to any > underlying ideology or power structure behind that environment. Optionally, > that person my retrospectively model the different experiences to find some > unifying patterns. -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
