I suspect that the arguments among anthropologists about dynamical systems are no more broken than in other disciplines. But they probably haven't had the education of watching a physicist or computer scientist defend a logically established dynamical fallacy to the death.
-- rec -- On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:19 AM, ∄ uǝʃƃ <[email protected]> wrote: > That's hilarious! What types of arguments about dynamical systems are NOT > broken? >8^D > > On 02/27/2018 11:53 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote: > > Author's comment on a summary of his paper: > > > > https://twitter.com/rlmcelreath/status/968482234289348608 > > > > "since verbal arguments abt dynamical systems are broken" > > > -- > ∄ uǝʃƃ > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
