< The fractures we're seeing in society, I think, are caused by an artificial 
discretization between individuals and tribes.  Millionaires discretize 
themselves from minimum wage workers.  Retired people discretize themselves 
from the working class.  Cops discretize themselves from the populace they 
police.  Etc.  If people would, more often, set aside their (mostly illusory 
anyway) agency and focus on accepting a Pawn role in others' games, we'd see 
fewer fractures. >

This may be true, but for me it is not about agency or identity. My `tribe’, if 
you insist on that word, is anonymous and (I believe, at least) pursues group 
goals not individual goals.   I don’t even know a Dreamer, but if there is a 
government shutdown in order to secure their place in this country, that’s fine 
with me.  It seems to me what you advocate is an exercise in incrementalism and 
tolerance of intolerance.  You’ll adapt to local rules because the counterparty 
feels the need to have them.    Maybe they just shouldn’t be like that in the 
first place.    Maybe what is _needed_ is a good strong amplification of 
conflict to bring things into focus?
  
Marcus

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to