Hi Nick,

I will speak only for myself:

This is another of those unfortunate terms, like Emergence, which is used by a 
variety of people in a variety of contexts to — they intend — refer to any ones 
among a variety of ideas that certainly are not operationally all the same, 
even if some of them are operationally defined.  I find it hopeless to start 
with the terms themselves and try to have a conversation that gets to anyplace 
definite.

Your quote below is from a particular context in evolutionary/developmental 
biology, as handled by a certain set of people, and quoting from a certain 
other set of people.  Whether there is even something I would recognize as an 
operationally defined concept in this context is not clear to me, though I 
think Gerhart’s and Kirschner’s descriptions of development with its 
consequences for evolution are insightful and important (whether or not they 
ever really formalize to any significant degree).  Maybe one could make model 
versions that reproduce important parts of the phenomenology, and claim that 
the models acting as abstractions formalize some sense of the term.

There are other uses that would make no reference to most of what is central in 
the developmental thinking, such as areas where “self-organization” refers to 
phenomena related to dynamical versions of phase transitions.  Maybe that usage 
and the developmental usage share some kind of family resemblance; that may 
also be in the eye of the beholder.

Why a certain collection of people think that organizing motifs in a diverse 
collection of phenomena bear enough of a resemblance to be grouped under a 
common umbrella term has large impacts on who choses to work together, and 
maybe what they look for and notice empirically.  Sometimes they can also 
borrow models back and forth.  Whether that perceived similarity reflects a 
real common dynamic in the world is a question that often lives on the far side 
of a lot of careful abstraction and modeling hard work within domains, and in 
many of these communities only a part of that work has been done in a sketchy 
way, if any at all has been done beyond loose description.

I don’t mind working at this loose and vague level of language, and spend a lot 
of time at that level.  But if I want to nail something down, I need to start 
to get a lot more explicit about what I want to describe and what question I 
have about it.  Often the set of interested readers lowers to a number 
somewhere between 0 and 1 at that stage.

All best,

Eric


> On Jan 13, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Nick Thompson <nickthomp...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi, everybody, 
>  
> The term “self-organizing” has always seemed a mis-nomer, almost an oxymoron. 
>  In that connection, I took an interest in the following quote from Mary Jane 
> West-Eberhardt’s enormous, DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY AND EVOLUTION. (p. 59, 
> bottom of column one)
>  
> Extreme modular flexibility is found in the mechanisms sometimes called 
> self-organizing (refs to Kauffman, Gerhart and Kirschner)  In seolf 
> organization, the phenotype does not really organize itself.  Rather, 
> organization is highly flexible and locally responsive because a large number 
> of modular subunits respond individually to local conditions according to 
> simple, shared decision rules.  
>  
> I wonder what you complexity folks think about this as a general and 
> comprehensive characterization of the phenomena you have called 
> “self-organizing”?
>  
> Nick 
> Nicholas S. Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
> Clark University
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
>  
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to