I used to argue with my parents (a lot) about whether or not humans were 
different from animals, mostly because my mom claimed animals don't have souls. 
 She's right, of course, because nobody has souls. 8^) But I think what it, 
ultimately devolves to is that humans come very close to universal 
constructors.  With the reflective layers of brain and opposable thumbs, we can 
do almost anything ... with the right resources, right context, etc.

So, at least in these arguments, it boiled down less to inherent worth (like 
depth of development) and more to productivity, but not the narrow productivity 
of, say, termites or such, but a wide productivity.  To be sure, my mom was 
more into embedded worth, whereas my dad was more "what have you done for us 
lately".  It was a good mix, though, because recessive traits can, eventually, 
come in critically handy.  (Perhaps that Trump voter knows how to play guitar 
or refine gasoline?)

In this (Christian?) context, animals like pigs and dogs are more like tools or 
articles of comfort than anything that deserves the Respect we give to humans.  
It is and always has been a disgusting way to think, to me ... perhaps the best 
confirming evidence I was adopted and have none of their biology (barring some 
shared bacteria, I suppose).  Even if I take the arguments that, as earthly 
gods, we're obliged to be good "stewards" of the creatures we OWN, it's still 
repugnant.  I can't even claim to own the tree in our backyard, which the 
government would claim we own ... a tree that's prettier and way older than I 
am.

On 10/28/2017 04:13 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> One difference between flies and pigs and humans is progressively deeper 
> development of each, if for no other reason than lifespan.   Paradoxes there 
> too:   My fondness and loyalty to my 12 year old dog was deeper than it is 
> for many humans. (Fat chance I'd send a 75-year-old, racist, redneck, 
> Joe-the-Trump voter thousands of dollars for cancer treatment.)   If it is 
> depth of development that matters, then as a society we ought to invest more 
> in retired people as their uniqueness is deeper and also more fragile.    But 
> instead we celebrate births even thought infants are mere hardware that won't 
> have consciousness for months after birth.
-- 
☣ gⅼеɳ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to