@Glen before diving to deep into it with numbers- do you have a working defination of Agnostic vs Atheist?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 8:54 AM, glen <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_%28codename%29 > > I don't disagree that low N studies are useful. But high N studies are also > useful. > > On 12/22/2014 06:06 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote: >> Nick wrote: >> >> "Well, 30 or more tiny fm radios placed at strategic locations around the >> mother board, might be more like it. No?" >> >> Like if a team of two or three aliens came to watch the Earth from orbit, >> before there was broadcasting. Relatively speaking, that's how many >> individual things they'd have to understand if 1 person = 1 neuron (putting >> aside that each person has 10,000 friends/synapses in this analogy) . I'm >> claiming it would be much more effective to take 30 people up in their >> spaceship and study them in detail. Perhaps from orbit they could make a >> good guess at that, e.g. a president, a popular athlete, a celebrity, >> several randomly selected people of different races, etc. > > > -- > ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella > The shackles of automata will shatter like their bones. > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
