As the JR Densmore I'd rather you no more than 300 clicks from a heart surgeon- that is unless it'd be fatally dumb to be that from one. I'll see your QOS and up it: this is a 2x sword: on one side,cybermesa has moral, and legal grounds to block botnets (for example) if they opt to do so, on the other hand, comcast now has the legal grounds to block netflix and my MMO habit.
I agree with you: that as one aspect of my daily life QOS is a massive problem in that for me throughput is is a huge issue. The direction comcast has gone we don't have raw-speed measured symmetrically. As Own might put it: Civillians only care about downloading bloodyfast. I, and I suspect he, would rather it be such that you are guaranteed gigs-asecond up and down. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote: > The real issue is not neutrality but QoS -- Quality of Service. I *want* > my heart surgeon to have higher bandwidth and lower latency than my > TiVo/NetFlix. QoS, both bandwidth and latency, needs to be properly doled > out between the services that actually need it. > > -- Owen > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Gillian Densmore > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> http://www.popsci.com/article/gadgets/what-know-about-net-neutrality-ruling?src=SOC&dom=fb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wedtech mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/wedtech_redfish.com >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wedtech mailing list > [email protected] > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/wedtech_redfish.com > >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
