On 12/04/2013 09:46 AM, Nick Thompson wrote: > if you take for granted that the world is not the sort of place that changes > on a dime. And where else could you have learned that save by induction.
Perhaps the fallacy doesn't lie in the general concept of reinforcement learning, but in the formulation of what "induction" means? I found it interesting that this guy was invited to give a talk at a local CFI meeting: Matt Thornton on Aliveness in Martial Arts http://youtu.be/WojPLwqYpzA the point, of course, being the difference between [un]predictability and the tightness of the coupling between your innards and your environment. -- glen ep ropella -- 971-255-2847 ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
