Well formulated Glen. The raw desire for a frozen blueberry Yogurt seems to have little to do with the mind, and the abstract thought of a Calabi-Yau manifold in 6 dimensions seems to have little to do with the body. An example where we feel this perplexing sense would be a situation where body and mind contradict each other: for instance my body may say I should eat a frozen blueberry Yogurt now, but my mind says I should not because it contains too much sugar. Or my body says I should have sex with that beautiful woman, but my mind says I should not because I am married.

The desire to eat comes from my body, and I can feel it comes from the inside (in the last instance it comes from the genes who have built a system which craves for our building blocks sugar and fat). The rule to avoid too much sugar is clearly learnt. I can feel it comes from the outside if I recall the rule or listen to the "Super-ego". As you know, Freud called the representation of the body which is responsible for the desire "id" ("das Es"), the representation of culture and mind "Super-ego" ("das Über-Ich"), and the mediator between both the ego ("das Ich"). Each of us has developed a complex personality which determines how Id and Super-ego interact to form the Ego. The sinner eats every Yogurt he can, the saint eats none at all and gives them away to the poor. The Tiger Woods or Bill Clinton type eats every Yogurt he can while pretending he has eaten only one.

Until we can explain this perplexing sense that there are parts of the body that seem to have little or nothing to do with the mind (and vice versa) the mind-body problem is not completely solved. It remains also unsolved as long as we can not explain how the mind emerges from the body, i.e. from the interactions of billions of knowledge molecules ("ideas") and Yogurt cells. In the end, the interactions of course lead to a vast network of neurons which incorporate all available knowledge and which are made from Yogurt cells. The devil is in the details. I think the trick here is to consider the body and the environment, i.e. the adaptive body embedded in a certain environment. A human being is a complex object living in multiple worlds, it is as a biological organism a certain instance of nature which meets a certain instance of culture during development, and both instances come together to form a unique connection between both worlds.

-J.

----- Original Message ----- From: "glen e. p. ropella" <[email protected]>
To: "The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: The Psychology Of Yogurt


Nicholas Thompson wrote circa 11-09-19 05:19 PM:
I realize that you didn't start this thread, so you may be as perplexed as I
am, but, what exactly IS the mind-body problem?

As I understand it, it's the perplexing sense that there are parts
(extended to processes by me if not others) of the body that seem to
have little or nothing to do with the mind.  And vice versa: there seem
to be thoughts that have little or nothing to do with the body.

--
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://tempusdictum.com




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to