Good article from The Economist on this as well:
http://www.the-economist.com/node/16930866

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Douglas Roberts <d...@parrot-farm.net>wrote:

> And now for something completely different:
>
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/09/05/212252/Fine-Structure-Constant-Maybe-Not-So-Constant
>
>
> *"**The fine-structure 
> constant*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant>
> *, a coupling constant characterizing the strength of the electromagnetic
> interaction, has been measured lately by scientists from the University of
> New South Wales in Sydney, Australia and **has been found to change
> slightly*<http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/62985/title/Changing_one_of_natures_constants>
> * in light sent from quasars in galaxies as far back as 12 billion years
> ago. Although the results look promising, caution is advised: 'This would be
> sensational if it were real, but I'm still not completely convinced that
> it's not simply systematic errors' in the data, comments cosmologist Max
> Tegmark of MIT. Craig Hogan of the University of Chicago and the Fermi
> National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Ill., acknowledges that 'it's a
> competent team and a thorough analysis.' But because the work has such
> profound implications for physics and requires such a high level of
> precision measurements, 'it needs more proof before we'll believe it.'"*
> *
> *
>
> *The implications, as one Slashdotter points out:*
> *
> *
>
> *The fine structure constant is given as being equal to "e^2/hc", so if
> the FSC is not a constant then one (or more) of the other values must also
> be a variable. Take your pick between:*
>
> *
>
>    - e, The elementary charge<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_charge>
>        [wikipedia.org]
>       - h, The reduced Planck 
> constant<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant>
>        [wikipedia.org]
>       - c, The speed of light in a 
> vacuum<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light_in_vacuum>
>        [wikipedia.org]
>
> *
>
> *
>
> If any of those constants turned out to in fact be variable, or even a
> "constant" which has varied over the lifetime of the universe, then the
> implications would be profound to say the least.
> *
>
>
> --Doug
>
>
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to