p.s. -

  A couple more interesting links:

   http://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/npcomplete.pdf

  (question:  anybody out there tried "anthropic computing"?  :-)

 and (some of what prompted the above):

  http://kryten.mm.rpi.edu/scb_pnp_solved22.pdf

  (consider the risks of careless reading . . . could this be a new entry in 
the "next Sokal" sweepstakes?)

tom

On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Tom Carter wrote:

> Owen -
> 
>  An interesting paper on some of these issues (you may recognize the author 
> :-) :
> 
>  http://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/36302/1/36302.pdf
> 
>  But, possibly more fun:
> 
>  
> http://books.google.com/books?id=XW7fICYtkg8C&pg=PA223&lpg=PA223&dq=spaghetti+dewdney&source=bl&ots=fXNU7klBKJ&sig=z3hibL7KkO-WG1ewPLzfNn9HmxU&hl=en&ei=7wqrS9-oNIT6sgPsj_TPDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false
> 
>   (if that link is too messy, google  spaghetti dewdney , and click the 
> google books link for The (new) Turing omnibus)
> 
>  Some exercises:
> 
>  1.)  Design a device to find the maximum of a set of real numbers in 1 step. 
>  (hint:  spaghetti)
> 
>  2.)  Find the maximum length path in a tree in 2 steps.
> 
>  3.)  Evaluate the validity of this algorithm for finding the maximum (no 
> loops) path between two given vertices in a connected graph:
> 
>        a.  Make the graph out of string/wire (see Dewdney . . .)
> 
>        b.  Hold the two vertices, one in each hand, and pull taut.  Cut one 
> (taut) link that doesn't separate the graph.
> 
>        c.  Repeat step b. until there are no more links that can be cut 
> without separating the graph.
> 
>        d.  The remaining taut line between the two vertices is the desired 
> path.   (or is it???)
> 
>        Note:  How can you make sure that cutting a particular link doesn't 
> separate the graph?  (hint:   wire . . . :-)
> 
> 
> 
>  For the more philosophically inclined:
> 
>  http://homepages.ipact.nl/~lokhorst/hypercomputationUCL.pdf
> 
>  And, a reference link for the future:
> 
>  http://www.mdpi.com/journal/computers/special_issues/analogcomp
> 
> tom
> 
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> 
>> In our Mathematical Thinking seminar (on computer science) today, the topic 
>> of Analog computing came up.
>> 
>> Do we have a good foundational approach to analog computing?  For example, 
>> analog automata, computational theory on decidability for analog computers, 
>> a notion of analog computational complexity?
>> 
>>   -- Owen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
> 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to