Good question! Let's see what my random philosophy generator has to say about this:
*It is plain that we have not simply lost an infinite horizon of approximations for phenomenology; we retain it, however, by a freely actualizable return to experiences. * Ah, yes: fine stuff. ;-} --Doug On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM, glen e. p. ropella < [email protected]> wrote: > Thus spake Douglas Roberts circa 09-09-22 12:27 PM: > > Nah. Let's go with philosophy. Again. > > Hm. Which is worse? Yahoos who have a tendency to wax philosophical or > yahoos who continually, insistently, repeat the same vapid objection to > philosophy over and over and over despite the lack of effect? > > What's the definition of "insanity" again? [grin] > > -- > glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://agent-based-modeling.com > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > -- Doug Roberts [email protected] [email protected] 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
