Jochen, 

You put me in a terrible conflict.  On the one hand, you are one of three
people who has ever read that paper, so I want to thank you .... in fact, I
want to bound into your lap like a large St. Bernard puppy and lick your
face ... so filled with gratitude am I .  For most of us, academic writing
is a lonely trade. 

On the other hand, I dont' THINK the paper says that.  Now, on my
understanding of mind, you are at least as good a judge of my intentions as
I am, and so I feel a rush of uncertainty as I say, "I never intended to be
... never have been?... a causal mentalist.  On my account, mind states
describe behavior, they dont explain it and they certainly dont cause it.  

 I will reread the paper and see what I said. 

But whatever the outcome of my rereading, thank you so very much for your
reading.  

All the best, 

Nick 

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University ([email protected])
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/




> [Original Message]
> From: Jochen Fromm <[email protected]>
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
> Date: 6/14/2009 6:56:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The ghost in the machine (was 'quick question')
>
> Your paper "Intentionality is the Mark of the Vital" 
> seems to fit better. It argues that it is unnecessary to 
> reconcile the mental with the material if we consider the 
> mental as intentional, and gives the example
>
>  A did D because A desired (wanted, believed..) [x]
>
> For example I can move my arm because I want it. 
> I want it means I have the intention to it. It is the
> intention which causes a kind of downward causation
> to low-level behaviors (from the prefrontal cortex to
> the premotor areas and the primary motor cortex).
> As the article says, intentional explanations may be
> the best way to describe the elusive nature of
> "mental" operations in a biological system.
>
> -J.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nicholas Thompson" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 7:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The ghost in the machine (was 'quick question')
>
>
> > Take care.  If you every were so idle and demented as to want to read
> > something I have written on the subject, you might try: 
> > 
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/id36.html
> > 
> > Nick 
> > 
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to