That's true. Interesting observation.
-J.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen Densmore" <[email protected]>
To: "Nicholas Thompson" <[email protected]>
Cc: "The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 5:13 AM
Subject: [FRIAM] The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in theNatural
Sciences
I'm completely of Tegmark's ilk:
A different response, advocated by Physicist Max Tegmark (2007), is
that physics is so successfully described by mathematics because the
physical world is completely mathematical, isomorphic to a mathematical
structure, and that we are simply uncovering this bit by bit. In this
interpretation, the various approximations that constitute our current
physics theories are successful because simple mathematical structures
can provide good approximations of certain aspects of more complex
mathematical structures. In other words, our successful theories are not
mathematics approximating physics, but mathematics approximating
mathematics.
-- Owen
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
