It seems to me that the real problem is with nature.

The argument seems to go that knowledge about (dangerous possibility)
phenomenon X might be put to bad use. Therefore we should destroy or at
least control that knowledge.

I don't think that's completely off the mark. To the extent that we can
control knowledge we may be able to develop a bit of a safety buffer for
ourselves. I have no problem with a policy that attempts to minimize the
spread of information about building nuclear weapons.

But the real problem isn't with knowledge about dangerous phenomenon X, it's
with X itself.

Presumably there is nothing we can do so that X is not part of the world. We
can't change nature so that E ≠ MC2.

In other words, don't blame the messenger (science) for the message (the
world is dangerous) and its corollary (someone who may misuse knowledge
about that danger may find out).

-- Russ


On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Marcus G. Daniels <[email protected]>wrote:

> Owen Densmore wrote:
>
>> Bill Joy was ripped for his observation that new technologies are almost
>> certain to be misused, and suggested the knowledge be guarded ..
>>
> For all of his reservations about the fragility of technology and the
> limitations of human design, the Internet did happen.   That came from the
> heroic efforts of a relatively small cadre of engineers, who could see so
> plainly what was needed.   The implications over the last twenty years for
> human communication have been profound and by in large good.   For example,
> the cognitive surplus in the post-television world and the  enormous
> economic and intangible benefits of that.    Certainly by the time there
> were viruses on the internet there were also people that could disassemble
> and disable them.
> I think the same will be true for robotics and genetic engineering.   The
> malevolent users of the technology will be relatively ignorant and
> inexperienced compared to the creators of it.   The creators will have
> already witnessed and contemplated the many ways in which things can go
> wrong.
>
> Marcus
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to