It kinda depends on the usage model. If the project has a lot of personnel churn and there is a mix of windows and Linux (like my current one), then cvs or anything centrally administered becomes a bit more problematic. I am inclined based on recent experiences to agree with Linus Torvalds, that subversion's motto "CVS done right" is not really a plus, though subversion is a bit easier to install, I think.
It is rumored that one can make GIT look like CVS, for those who are so attached. No experience on that though. Carl Marcus G. Daniels wrote: > Douglas Roberts wrote: > >> IMHO, Subversion is the way to go. Been using it for years. >> > All the cool kids are using GIT and Mercurial. But I like SVN too, I > think just because it's like a CVS that works. > (e.g. its familiar) > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > > ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
