Glen,
WHOA!
Or is that "WO!"
Or perhaps "WOE!"
I COMMENT BELOW IN CAPS TO DISTINGUISH MY COMMENTS FROM THE ORIGINAL TEXT.
I PROMISE i AM NOT SHOUTING. REALLY! THIS IS >>>>>SHOUTING<<<<<<<<.
Glen--I disagree. In fact, I think Nick's equation of expressing one's
political/ideological views with flatulence demonstrates Nick's egotism.
Not everyone thinks their opinions are purely factual, as apparently
Nick does.
NICK DOES NOT THINK THIS. ON THE CONTRARY. SORRY TO HAVE LEFT THIS
IMPRESSION.
Glen -- Experts have just as much gas as ordinary people. In fact,
most "experts" (particularly those who refer to themselves as "experts")
seem to have WAY more GAS than ordinary people.
I ABSOLUTELY AGREE.
Glen--So, an IT-Judiciary would essentially be a bunch of pompous ... [cough]
... experts with more flatulence than a normal political/ideological
discussion amongst non-experts.
THANKS FOR YOUR THOUGHTS. YOU ARE THE ONLY PERSON TO COMMENT ON THIS IDEA SO
FAR, AND .I WILL TAKE WHAT COMMENT I CAN GET.
BUT DON'T YOU AGREE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "OPINIONATING" AND "ARGUING",
A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "TALK SHOW" DISCOURSE AND TOUGH BUT USEFUL DISAGREEMENT?
PERHAPS NOT.
ONE POINT I WOULD HATE TO SEE LOST IN THE FLAMES HERE IS THAT THE LAWS AND
INSTITUTIONS THAT PROTECT INDIVIDUAL CIVIL LIBERTIES MAY BE ILL SUITED TO THE
AGE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. LET'S SAY THAT IN GRAND JURY TESTIMONY IT IS
MENTIONED THAT MALCOLM WOMBLY IS MAKING METHANE BOMBS IN HIS BASEMENT. THE FBI
WANTS TO MAKE WOMBLY A TARGET OF AN INVESTIGATION. IT GOES TO A JUDGE, THE
JUDGE EVALUATES THE PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE AND MAY OR MAY NOT GRANT A WARRANT.
NOW LET'S TAKE ANOTHER CASE. THE CIA HEARS THAT PERHAPS A DIRTY BOMB IS BEING
ASSEMBLED IN SOMEWHERE IN THE WORLD FROM APPARENTLY INNOCENT MATERIALS BEING
PURCHASED IN NEWARK, NEW JERSEY. IT HAS NO IDEA WHO IS DOING IT, BUT KNOWS
THAT ANYBODY WHO IS DOING IT MUST LEAVE A PARTICULAR COMMUNICATIONS "SIGNaTURE"
BEHIND. THE CIA WANTS TO SEND A BOT LOOKING FOR THAT SIGNATURE, WHICH MIGHT
REQUIRE "TAPPING" EVERY PHONE IN NEWARK IN A SINGLE DAY. UNDER PRESENT
CIRCUMSTANCES, THEY JUST DO IT, RIGHT, AND BUGGER CONGRESS. PERHAPS THAT;S OK.
BUT HOW WOULD WE FEEL IF THE SIGNATURE WERE NOT BOMBMAKING BUT SINGLE PAYER
HEALTH CARE ......"SOCIALISM" THAT THE BOT IS LOOKING FOR. WOULDN'T WE LIKE
SPECIAL JUDICIARY, SOPHISTICATED BOTH IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND IN COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY WHOSE JOB IT WAS TO EVALUATE THE GOVERNMENT'S PROGRAMS OF
INFORMATION GATHERING?
AND ISN'T THE FRIAM LIST PARTICULARLY QUALIFIED BY EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, TO
CONTRIBUTE TO THE DISCUSSION OF THIS IDEA? THAT IS ALL i WAS TRYING TO SAY.
ALL THE BEST,
NICK
Nicholas S. Thompson
Research Associate, Redfish Group, Santa Fe, NM ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
