Title: Message
Can't help but mention, but really not meant to be argumentative for all the good reasons, and since several things on the list are exactly the kinds of things I'm interested in, but notably missing from the great list of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsolved_problems_in_physics is growth.   So I added it.  Let's see if someone erases it without coming to agreed language on how to state the problem!
 
 

Phil Henshaw                       ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
680 Ft. Washington Ave
NY NY 10040                      
tel: 212-795-4844                
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]         
explorations: www.synapse9.com   
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Holmes
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 10:29 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Unstrung



On 10/3/06, phil henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I picked up last week's New Yorker to find one of it's thorough and insightful articles of the same name, in this case by Jim Holt on the demise of string theory, and the books by Smolin and Woit.  What caught my attention was the apparent fact that what caused string theory to suddenly take over all of theoretical physics is that physics has run out of data!    Apparently everything they've thought of trying to explain has been


Errrr...how to put this politely? Rubbish! The following lists are by by no means definitive but there's enough content to establish the falsity of "everything they've thought of trying to explain has been":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics#Future_directions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsolved_problems_in_physics

I think you may be reading more into Holt's comment about "the absence of data in physics" than is intended (BTW, article is still available at  http://www.newyorker.com/critics/atlarge/ ).  It seems to be a somewhat tongue-in-cheek comment that occupies less than half a sentence and Holt does not expand on it. IMHO, Holt gives much more weight to the "sociology" explanation.

R

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to