Owen (and perhaps others) So are you bashing at the first chapter?
Here's how I understand a strictly dominant strategy. If you and I are players in a two player game with n different strategies, then Strategy S2 is strictly dominant for you, if picking S2 will miximize your return for any particular move by me. Strategy S1 is strictly dominant for me, if your picking S1 and your having picked S2 in response maximizes my return. The cell S1/S2 is a Nash Equilibrium if in the S1 column there is no value greater for me other than the S1/S2 cell, and also in the S2 row, there is no value greater for you than that in the S1/s2 cell Do I have this NEAR right???? Nick > [Original Message] > From: Owen Densmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> > Date: 8/10/2006 11:59:59 AM > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Game Theory Evolving > > Oops, *blush* .. sorry! > > I've read the start of Game Theory Evolving, and plan to complete the > Whole Damn Thing. None of the others though. > > -- Owen > > Owen Densmore > http://backspaces.net - http://redfish.com - http://friam.org > > > On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Nicholas Thompson wrote: > > > Owen, > > > > Game Theory Evolving. (It was in the subject line.) > > > > Have you read any of the others???? > > > > N > > ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
