External Email - Use Caution        

My-Computer:~ boris$ mri_aparc2aseg --s 1122 --volmask --aseg 
BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz --o aparc+BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz
SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir
subject 1122
outvol aparc+BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz
useribbon 0
baseoffset 0
RipUnknown 0

Reading lh white surface 
 /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/surf/lh.white

Reading lh pial surface 
 /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/surf/lh.pial

Loading lh annotations from /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/label/lh.aparc.annot
reading colortable from annotation file...
colortable with 36 entries read (originally 
/autofs/space/tanha_002/users/greve/fsdev.build/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)

Reading rh white surface 
 /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/surf/rh.white

Reading rh pial surface 
 /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/surf/rh.pial

Loading rh annotations from /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/label/rh.aparc.annot
reading colortable from annotation file...
colortable with 36 entries read (originally 
/autofs/space/tanha_002/users/greve/fsdev.build/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt)
Have color table for lh white annotation
Have color table for rh white annotation
Loading ribbon segmentation from /Users/boris/Desktop/mydir/1122/mri/ribbon.mgz

Building hash of lh white

Building hash of lh pial

Building hash of rh white

Building hash of rh pial
ERROR: cannot find aseg


I get the same result using aseg.mgz 

Thanks,
Boris
> Am 12.12.2019 um 17:37 schrieb Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
> 
> Hi Boris
> 
> can you send us the full command line and screen output of the commands that 
> are failing?
> 
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
> 
>>         External Email - Use Caution        
>> Thanks. unfortunately I get an error message when I use the --aseg flag for 
>> BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz but
>> even, if I'm using the original aseg.mgz I get: ERROR: cannot find aseg
>> .../fs_all_subjects/xyz/mri/aseg.mgz
>> The file BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz was created using: 
>> mri_ca_label $SUBJECTS_DIR/xyz/mri/brain.mgz
>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/xyz/mri/transforms/talairach.m3z
>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/BN_Atlas_subcortex.gca
>> $SUBJECTS_DIR/xyz/mri/BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz
>> Best,
>> Boris
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:30 AM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. 
>> <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>      What is in BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz ? Is it like aseg.mgz but with your
>>      subcortical ROIs added? If so, you can try merging it with the aparc, 
>> eg,
>> 
>>      mri_aparc2aseg --s subject --volmask --aseg BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz --o
>>      aparc+BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz
>> 
>>      Then use aparc+BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz as input to xcerebralseg, and then
>>      run gtmseg as you have done below.
>> 
>>      Let me know if that works
>>      doug
>> 
>>      On 12/2/19 1:18 PM, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
>>      >
>>      >         External Email - Use Caution
>>      >
>>      > In this example tried it with only the subcortical segmentations from
>>      > my atlas. Please find the logfile attached. It gives me back: "tissue
>>      > type is not set" but I set it to 2 in the LUT.txt
>>      >
>>      > In principle look the following commands right to you?
>>      >
>>      > xcerebralseg --s 0120test --o apas+head+subcort_BN.mgz --m
>>      > BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz --atlas BN_Atlas_subcortex.gca
>>      >
>>      > gtmseg --s 0120test --head apas+head+subcort_BN.mgz --ctab
>>      > subcort_BN_LUT.txt --o gtmseg+subcort_BN.mgz
>>      >
>>      > Ideally I would have a gtmseg with both, the subcortical and the
>>      > cortical structures, but only the subcortical would also be fine as
>>      > long as I can get  mri_gtmpvc running on it.
>>      >
>>      > Thanks,
>>      > Boris
>>      >
>>      > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 5:31 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
>>      > <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>>      >
>>      >     Can you send the log file for each of the gtmseg runs?
>>      >
>>      >     On 11/26/2019 1:09 PM, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
>>      >>
>>      >>             External Email - Use Caution
>>      >>
>>      >>     Thank you! I have a gca for subcortical  and two gcs (lh/rh) for
>>      >>     cortical structures.
>>      >>     I created an annot (rh/lh) and a mgz using mris_ca_label
>>      >>     and mri_ca_label for parcellation/segmentation stats.
>>      >>
>>      >>     For the PET analysis I have the following problem:
>>      >>
>>      >>     If I use this command: gtmseg --s test --o test.mgz --ctab
>>      >>     /xyz/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt --head BN_Atlas_subcotex.mgz
>>      >>     --ctx-annot BN_Atlas.annot --ctab '/xyz/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt'
>>      >>
>>      >>     It gives me the right regions for subcortical structures but it
>>      >>     looks like it uses the standard FS parcellation with my labels
>>      >>     for the cortical parcellations (only 93 cortical regions instead
>>      >>     of 210).
>>      >>
>>      >>     If I use gtmseg --s 0059test --o onlyhead.gtmseg_test.mgz
>>      >>     --ctx-annot BN_Atlas.annot --ctab '/xyz/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt'
>>      >>     --no-xcerseg I get all my 210 cortical parcellations but the
>>      >>     standard FS subcortical segmentations.
>>      >>
>>      >>     How can I use both in one gtmseg so that I can proceed with it
>>      >>     doing my PET analysis in PETSurfer? It is not totally clear for
>>      >>     me what to merge using xcerebralseg.
>>      >>
>>      >>     Thanks a lot!
>>      >>
>>      >>     On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:28 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
>>      >>     <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>>      >>
>>      >>         It gets the subcortical from apas+head.mgz which gets created
>>      >>         along the
>>      >>         way by xcerebralseg. You can create your own with
>>      >>         xcerebralseg by
>>      >>         specifying your volume as the mergevol. I think this will
>>      >>         work, but I'm
>>      >>         not sure. I'm assuming you've used the GCA to create your own
>>      >>         subcortical seg for the given subject
>>      >>
>>      >>         On 11/5/19 1:06 PM, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >         External Email - Use Caution
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         > I just realized that the above mentioned command (gtmseg
>>      >>         --s XYZ --o
>>      >>         > BN.gtmseg.mgz --ctx-annot BN_Atlas.annot --ctab
>>      >>         > '/media/XYZ/BN_Atlas_freesurfer/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt'
>>      >>         --no-xcerseg)
>>      >>         > gives me only the cortical segmentation. Is there any way
>>      >>         to also
>>      >>         > include the subcortical segmentation based on my individual
>>      >>         atlas? I
>>      >>         > also have an Atlas_subcortex.gca file available.
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         > Best,
>>      >>         > Boris
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:10 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
>>      >>         > <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>> wrote:
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >     There is no cut off for the minimum size. As it gets
>>      >>         smaller, the PVC
>>      >>         >     noise amplification will become bigger (it also depends
>>      >>         on the
>>      >>         >     shape as
>>      >>         >     well).
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >     I think the --no-xcerseg is the right way to go now
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >     On 8/13/19 11:00 AM, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     >         External Email - Use Caution
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     > Thank you for your prompt answer - the command
>>      >>         worked. This is the
>>      >>         >     > atlas mentioned:
>>      >>         http://atlas.brainnetome.org/brainnetome.html
>>      >>         <http://atlas.brainnetome.org/brainnetome.html>
>>      >>         >     > What is approximately the smallest possible segment
>>      >>         when using PVC?
>>      >>         >     > Also, does the exclusion of extracerebral structures
>>      >>         harm? I
>>      >>         >     used that
>>      >>         >     > flag because it complained:
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     > gtmseg --s XYZ --o BN.gtmseg.mgz --ctx-annot
>>      >>         BN_Atlas.annot --ctab
>>      >>         >     > '/media/XYZ/BN_Atlas_freesurfer/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt'
>>      >>         >     > ERROR: /media/subjects/XYZ/mri/apas+head.mgz exists.
>>      >>         This is ok
>>      >>         >     > but you must indicate whether to use what is there
>>      >>         (--no-xcerseg)
>>      >>         >     > or create a new one and overwrite what is there
>>      >>         (--xcerseg)
>>      >>         >     > or specify your own headseg (--head)
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     > and did not want to override my apas+head.mgz
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     > Thanks,
>>      >>         >     > Boris
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:44 PM Greve, Douglas 
>> N.,Ph.D.
>>      >>         >     > <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>>>
>>      >>         >     wrote:
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     >     I don't know what the Brainnetome is, but it
>>      >>         looks like you have
>>      >>         >     >     it in
>>      >>         >     >     annotation form. I think that command should
>>      >>         work. Why are
>>      >>         >     you using
>>      >>         >     >     --no-xcerseg? This will cause it to not include
>>      >>         extracerebral
>>      >>         >     >     structures. Also note that you cannot use
>>      >>         arbitrarily small
>>      >>         >     segments
>>      >>         >     >     when doing PVC.
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     >     On 8/13/19 10:26 AM, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     >         External Email - Use Caution
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     > Dear all,
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     > my intention is to use the Brainnetome Atlas
>>      >>         >     >     parcellation/segmentation
>>      >>         >     >     > in PETSurfer to obtain PVC corrected SUVRs for
>>      >>         the atlas
>>      >>         >     ROIs. I
>>      >>         >     >     used:
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     > gtmseg --s XYZ --o BN.gtmseg.mgz --ctx-annot
>>      >>         >     BN_Atlas.annot --ctab
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         '/media/XYZ/BN_Atlas_freesurfer/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt'
>>      >>         >     --no-xcerseg
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     > Is this the right approach to obtain a high
>>      >>         resolution
>>      >>         >     >     segmentation to
>>      >>         >     >     > run PVC methods?
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     > Thanks,
>>      >>         >     >     > Boris
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         >     >     > _______________________________________________
>>      >>         >     >     > Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>         >     >     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>>      >>         >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
>>      >>         >     >     >
>>      >>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     >  _______________________________________________
>>      >>         >     >     Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>         >     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         >     > _______________________________________________
>>      >>         >     > Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>         >     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>>      >>         >     >
>>      >>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >  _______________________________________________
>>      >>         >     Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>         > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>>      >>         > 
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         >
>>      >>         > _______________________________________________
>>      >>         > Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>         > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         > 
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >>         _______________________________________________
>>      >>         Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>         Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      >>         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >>
>>      >>
>>      >>     _______________________________________________
>>      >>     Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  
>> <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >
>>      >     _______________________________________________
>>      >     Freesurfer mailing list
>>      >     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      >     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > _______________________________________________
>>      > Freesurfer mailing list
>>      > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>> 
>>      _______________________________________________
>>      Freesurfer mailing list
>>      Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>      https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to