External Email - Use Caution        

Dear Doug,
Thanks a lot!!!
3t flag helps very much. The data looks fine now.
All the best
Agnieszka

pon., 19 sie 2019 o 15:59 Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
napisał(a):

> Hi Agnieska, sorry for the delay. It looks like the contrast is slightly
> different than FS expects. I ran it with the -3T flag (which changes the
> talairach atlas), and it seemed to run fine on that subject. Try it out.
> best
> doug
>
> On 8/19/2019 1:23 AM, Agnieszka Sabisz wrote:
>
>         External Email - Use Caution
> Dear Doug,
> I uploaded the data by ftp in Windows 10 on 1st Aug. I hope You can see a
> tar file. The file's name is HTN_Con_096 and it contains the subject's
> folder after recon_all. Do You need any other data?
> All the best
>
> czw., 1 sie 2019 o 11:44 Agnieszka Sabisz <agnieszkasab...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Dear Doug,
>> I uploaded the data by ftp in Windows 10. I hope You can see a tar file.
>> The file's name is HTN_Con_096 and it contains the subject's folder after
>> recon_all. Do You need any other data?
>> All the best
>> Agnieszka
>>
>> pon., 29 lip 2019 o 22:44 Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> That is a little strange. Can you tar up the data and upload it to
>>> ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/incoming
>>> Let me know when it is there and what the file name is
>>>
>>> On 7/24/19 4:53 AM, Agnieszka Sabisz wrote:
>>> >
>>> >         External Email - Use Caution
>>> >
>>> > Dear Freesurfer Team,
>>> > I checked skull stripping and I think it's all right. (see in
>>> attachment)
>>> > The registration looks all right in translational directions but not
>>> > in scaling. In the attachment you can see the comparison between
>>> > tkregister view and freeview of the same patient.
>>> > What may be the reason and how to cope with that? We cannot normalize
>>> > the volume data to eTIV (as it is not proper), what value should we
>>> > use instead?
>>> > Best regards,
>>> > Agnieszka
>>> >
>>> > sob., 22 cze 2019 o 02:15 Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
>>> > <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> napisał(a):
>>> >
>>> >     If the registration looks ok then it probably means that the skull
>>> >     stripping was too aggressive. Have you looked at the skull
>>> stripping?
>>> >
>>> >     On 6/14/2019 1:40 PM, Agnieszka Sabisz wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>             External Email - Use Caution
>>> >>
>>> >>     Hi all!
>>> >>
>>> >>     We are running FS v.6.0. on a supercomputer operating on Linux.
>>> >>     We have two sets of data - one from 1.5T Aera Siemens, second
>>> >>     from 3.0T Achieva TX Philips. The T1 images on both scanners have
>>> >>     comparable CNR, with an isotropic resolution of 1mm3 each. The
>>> >>     recon-all finished with no errors, but in approximately half of
>>> >>     the Philips data there is a significant (up to 40%) difference
>>> >>     between the brain mask volume and eTIV (no such problem on
>>> >>     Siemens). We inspected the Talairach registration (as is pointed
>>> >>     that eTIV is calculated upon it) in the mismatched data with:
>>> >>     tkregister2 --mgz --s <subject> --fstal --surf orig
>>> >>     and in the corrupted data the brain mask and the WM-GM borders
>>> >>     align in terms of placement but are of a wrong scale
>>> >>     (proportionate to the "brainmask-to-eTIV" difference).
>>> >>
>>> >>     What may be the reason and how to cope with that? We cannot
>>> >>     normalize the volume data to eTIV (as it is not proper), what
>>> >>     value should we use instead?
>>> >>
>>> >>     Attached you will find example tkregister2 output screenshots.
>>> >>
>>> >>     Best regards,
>>> >>     Agnieszka Sabisz
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>     _______________________________________________
>>> >>     Freesurfer mailing list
>>> >>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> >>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>> >
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     Freesurfer mailing list
>>> >     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> >     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Freesurfer mailing list
>>> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing 
> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to